Mediation: Who Is It Really For?
Legacy signals
Legacy popularity: 1,526 legacy views
Legacy rating: 3/5 from 1 archived votes
Who are we actually doing this for? Let’s face it, the self gratification that we as mediators get after settling a case gives us a rush only morphine can sedate. The satisfaction of having two people agree on a mutual solution is a great feeling even if that feeling is not shared by the parties or their atto
eys. Elegantly scratching your signature on a legally bonding contract and knowing that you had some “small” part in it is awesome. Settling cases is a whole purpose of being a mediator, it is the reason we get up in the morning and go to bed early at night. Mediators live, and love to settle - that is a fact.
How about our clients; do we not hold some kind of an obligation to them? Some people will tell you that a successful mediation is when both parties leave unhappy. However, from personal experience I never feel good when the disputants leave unsatisfied. I like to see the smiles on peoples’ faces as they sign the contract, I like to see the relief that they get from the certainty of their decision and of the fact that tomorrow they will not be troubled by the case. I enjoy the civilized conversations after the settlement without the sarcastic remarks at one another. You can practically feel the atmosphere around you get lighter and a sense of relief seep in from every possible direction, right after those four words have been said, “We have a deal.”
There are, of course, those times when a settlement is not the answer for either side and as an ethical and fair mediator you persuade both parties to take the necessary steps in order to come back to the mediation at a later time with more discoveries, authority or whatever is necessary to settle. There probably is not a worse feeling than knowing that you have let one get away, that they could have settled and you could have been a big part of it, but instead the case went to litigation and cost both sides more money and time; worse of all it cost you the satisfaction of settling the dispute.
Mediators are a competitive bunch of people, keeping track of how many cases they have settled, how many settled before a mediation and how many after. Of course, why shouldn’t they be? Mediation is a competitive business and ones track record, aside from their education and experience, is what most atto
eys look at before hiring. But do we, as mediators, really keep track in order to get new business or for our selves? I think that it’s obviously both; however, it sure does feel pretty good to know that with a higher success rate we are more likely to have the tremendous pleasure of settling yet another case, and hopefully this time both parties will be as satisfied as we are.
Article author
About the Author
Alex Dukhovny is an owner and CEO of Right Triangle Mediation. With many years of negotiating experience and teaching expertise he had created mutually beneficial partnerships with such companies as Federated Department Stores, Fidelity, Prudential, Enterprise Rent-a-Car and many others. His contribution to the world of negotiation and ADR have been vast and continuous.
Further reading
Further Reading
Article
Flaws of Win-Win – part II
In the former article: Flaws of Win-Win - part I, I’ve tried to show why the Win-Win model that advocates collaboration is not necessarily an Archimedean point in initiating collaboration. Hopefully I’ve left you with the question “o.k. so what do you offer instead?”r
Related piece
Article
Flaws of Win-Win – part I
What if I'll tell you, that the Win-Win approach - the one that we all (including myself) - were raised upon, does not work out in the field! Most of the times I present this idea to a group of people, I get strange looks. It doesn't stop to surprise me, how deep the Win-Win perception is rooted in our mind. How the solution where everybody come out "happy" is a belief held by so many although most of the time it leads to compromises.r
Related piece
Article
Managing Difficult Conversations - Part I
Introduction - What is a Difficult Conversation?
Related piece
Article
How to Resolve Family Conflicts - The Art of Setting Boundaries
Human intelligence ranks as one of the broadest terms. I.Q is one of the aspects that can test one’s intelligence much as various aspects of our lives also require intelligence. Over a decade ago, Daniel Goldman determined that there is emotional intelligence, physical intelligence, social intelligence and so on. For a kid to fulfill their potential, various abilities will have to come into play. For instance, a kid possessing high IQ but low frustration threshold might achieve lower results compared to a kid with low IQ but high frustration threshold.
Related piece