Article

Unlocking epistemic traps

Topic: Negotiating SkillsFeaturing Asaf ShaniPublished Recently added

Legacy signals

Legacy popularity: 2,593 legacy views

Legacy rating: 3/5 from 1 archived votes

"What turned in on will turn it off" – since the epistemic trap was created by self, it's in one's hands to unlock oneself. In other words, the door can only be opened from the inside.
This point lays in the foundation of Phenomenology.
Let's explain the term using an example: Think of a dog, any dog that comes to your mind. What feeling arise in you while watching, privately, the picture of the dog? Did you experience positive feelings like love, or negative ones, like anxiety?
The image of the dog and the feelings associated with it are known to the person who perceived them and to him alone - no one but him will know whether is was a Rottweiler or a cuddly Poodle.
We experience the world in a subjective – private way. Phenomenology (from the word phenomenon), which was first defined by the 20th century German Philosopher Edmund Husserl, says exactly that. Our experience of the phenomenon around us is completely private and subjective and in order to understand them, one needs to duplicate the other's point of view. The inner world of self can be understood by others only by duplicating one's inner world.
Duplication should not be confused with either understanding or agreeing. Duplication is merely allowing a point of view to manifest itself in one's head without any judgments arising.
We try to change the viewpoint of people around us dozens of times a day. Whether our peers, subordinates, clients, spouse or our children, we try to bring their point of view as close as possible to ours. One might even say that the level of happiness we feel is in direct correlation to the level of change we're created in the surrounding environment.
The first stage in altering one's point of view – freeing him from the epistemic trap – is by adopting a Phenomenological approach. Understanding that the change can occur only from within – from the other's inner world.

Further reading

Further Reading

4 total

Article

In the former article: Flaws of Win-Win - part I, I’ve tried to show why the Win-Win model that advocates collaboration is not necessarily an Archimedean point in initiating collaboration. Hopefully I’ve left you with the question “o.k. so what do you offer instead?”r

Related piece

Article

What if I'll tell you, that the Win-Win approach - the one that we all (including myself) - were raised upon, does not work out in the field! Most of the times I present this idea to a group of people, I get strange looks. It doesn't stop to surprise me, how deep the Win-Win perception is rooted in our mind. How the solution where everybody come out "happy" is a belief held by so many although most of the time it leads to compromises.r

Related piece

Article

Introduction - What is a Difficult Conversation?

Related piece

Article

Human intelligence ranks as one of the broadest terms. I.Q is one of the aspects that can test one’s intelligence much as various aspects of our lives also require intelligence. Over a decade ago, Daniel Goldman determined that there is emotional intelligence, physical intelligence, social intelligence and so on. For a kid to fulfill their potential, various abilities will have to come into play. For instance, a kid possessing high IQ but low frustration threshold might achieve lower results compared to a kid with low IQ but high frustration threshold.

Related piece