Fighting Islamic Extremists Who Stifle Free Speech

IntroductionrnThe article provides a deeper insight into the topic of Free Speech, with its implication directed towards the recent events that have brought several issues to attention. Building upon the recent events, the Muslim response to various things, an example of the South Park episode, in particular, have displayed the harsh effects of what the Muslim world is capable of and how they will respond to such issues. The South Park episode brought in a strictly bad reaction, which was inclusive of death threats for the producers of the show with their addresses displayed and other detailed information. Displaying this information was a reminder, attached with the picture of Theo Van Gogh. Theo Van Gogh became a target of hatred shunned on free speech. He was murdered brutally and savagely in broad daylight, in Amsterdam. This hateful reaction was simply because of his movie based on how Islam is mistreating women. Although his life did little to offer for such extremism as the other people involved in some manner, were reported to have gone into hiding or placed under police protection, to avoid fates such as that of Theo Van Gogh.rnThesis StatementrnThe topic will discuss the effects of exercising Free Speech and the impacts of Muslim extremist stifling it. DiscussionrnThis also brings the discussion back to the topic of abortion, which has always been at the receiving end of violence. Most of the doctors who had previously performed an abortion were either listed down, and their names were displayed at the venues of ACLA and the ones that had been murdered or wounded badly. These doctors had their names struck out, meaning that they had been dealt with a serious blow. The facts presented in the paper "Fighting Islamic Extremists who stifle free speech" is a true embodiment of horrors which have befallen those that stood up (Modood, Tariq, et al. 2006), to voice out their opinion through the use of Free Speech. The article's thesis has a strong association with the discussion that follows along in the article, fully covering up each fact with proper evidence to back it up. These extremists act, the discussion has presented a detailed description, display the effects of how each person over The Internet especially, has been chastised. In order to deal with this issue, in a legal manner, the implication of a Federal Law was dearly needed. The Federal Law would cover two things; namely, the first one will have a direct effect on avoiding any forms of violent treatment towards free speech. Secondly, it promotes the notion of provision will empower the victims that have undergone intimidations, to become empowered enough to fend for themselves as attorney generals or their rights.rnIn order to avoid an uneventful experience, Comedy Central censored and removed parts of South Park that had objectified and discussed Muhammad. Although, there were several jokes made towards Buddha and Jesus. This censorship was put in place to avoid hostility from the Muslim community and to escape the same fate as Theo Van Gogh possibly. Similarly, most of the other productions have taken such measures to ensure their safety and to evade any hostile retaliation from the ever-expanding Muslim community. Since Free Speech falls under First Amendment, yet exercising this right has brought nothing but ill fate for many. ConclusionsrnThe article "Fighting Islamic Extremists who stifle Free Speech" goes to great lengths of how the Muslim community has displayed acts of violence over various incidents where individuals had exercised free speech. Since Free Speech falls under First Amendment, yet exercising this right has brought nothing but ill fate for many. In order to deal with this issue, in a legal manner, the implication of a Federal Law was dearly needed.