Article

How Can Leadership Style Affect a Project?

Topic: Business DevelopmentPublished January 31, 2013

Reader stats

816 views

Article rating

No ratings yet

Reader rating appears publicly after enough eligible article ratings.

Rate this article

Sign in to rate this article.

Sign in to rate this article

As a Project Manager, you will no doubt have your own style of leadership which helps you to deliver your projects consistently successfully, on time, and within budget. Good project management involves being able to adapt favourably to any given situation and take advantage of opportunities presented to you, which is, of course, influenced by your approach to leadership. It is, therefore, useful to have a basic understanding of the most common types of leadership styles , allowing you to change your technique and style depending on the time constraints and other factors for any given project.

Many business thought leaders have developed leadership theories that can be used to analyse the way you work and help you grow as a professional Project Manager. One of the oldest situational theories was developed by a psychologist named Kurt Lewin in 1939, whereby he identified three key styles of leadership.
Authoritarian Leaders

As an authoritarian leader, you will be clear about the tasks, boundaries and expectations of your team. You will be likely to hand out tasks but will not be involved on a team level – instead, taking the role of autocrat.

Pros: If you are required to deliver a project within a very short timescale, this style of working leaves little room for error.
Cons: creativity and innovation become stifled. If the project you are working on is longer term, you will likely be creating an uninspiring work environment for your project team, which may lead to resentment and be counter-productive to your leadership.

Democratic Leaders

If you are a democratic (or participative) leader, you will not only be clear about your project’s priorities and key deliverables, but will also leave room for creativity within your team, involving them in the decision making process. You will listen to and value your team’s input, but will ultimately have the final say-so on any decisions.
Pros: if you are able to encourage creative thinking and problem solving from your team whilst retaining a firm handle on budget, costs and general project oversight, it will enhance the value of the end deliverable, as well as create an enjoyable working environment.
Cons: it may not be the right approach when time restraints are very tight.
Delegative Leaders

This style is sometimes described as laissez-faire, since it adopts such a relaxed attitude. A delegative leader will hand all responsibility for goal setting and management to the project team, allowing them to make key decisions and steer the project themselves.
Pros: the high levels of trust may motivate the team to deliver a high-quality and innovative solution.

Cons: with the lack of a leader, the team may eventually lack direction and become disillusioned.
Whatever your natural project management style, it is always good practice to reflect on the way you lead a team, considering how it may be affecting the project as well as the working environment. In certain situations, you will need to adapt your leadership style for the good of the project, as well as the team, in which case you might find one of the many project management courses available will help to rethink your personal approach to projects.

Article author

About the Author

The author is a certified Project Manager and believes all PM professionals should keep their skills up-to-date with the latest project management courses. She also writes a Project Management Blog.

Further reading

Further Reading

4 total

Article

Artificial intelligence continues to dominate business conversations, but enthusiasm alone does not guarantee results. While many companies rush to adopt AI in hopes of gaining a competitive edge, a large number of initiatives still fall short. The problem is rarely the technology itself. More often, failure happens because organizations approach AI without the structure, readiness, and discipline required for long-term success. AI projects do not fail because the technology

March 4, 2026

Article

AI Avatar Development: Real Innovation or Just Hype? In today’s hyperconnected world, attention is currency. To stand out, brands can no longer settle for flashy features or surface-level engagement. They need to build meaningful, scalable, and personalized experiences. Enter AI avatars: digital humans that are revolutionizing communication by bringing lifelike presence to virtual interactions. Imagine a team member who never takes a coffee break, speaks ten languages fluen

February 27, 2026

Article

The Quiet Engine Behind Every Connection Most people think of telecom services as towers, signals, and mobile data moving invisibly through the air. Yet behind every call that connects and every message that reaches its destination, there is another system quietly working in the background. That system is the call center. While customers often interact with telecom companies only when something goes wrong, these centers operate constantly, guiding problems toward solutions an

February 23, 2026

Article

Introduction The solar industry once believed that collecting as many leads as possible was the fastest path to growth. Marketing teams focused on filling databases with names, phone numbers, and email addresses. At first, the numbers looked promising. Dashboards showed rising interest and more inquiries than ever before. Yet behind the scenes, many companies began to notice a quiet problem. Revenue growth did not match the flood of leads. Sales teams felt overwhelmed, conver

February 6, 2026